China's Great Noodle Debate: Should Instant Noodles be Banned on High-Speed Trains?
The recent suggestion by China's high-speed rail authorities to refrain from eating instant noodles on trains has sparked a heated debate among the country's netizens. The controversy began when a passenger posted a photo of a reminder on a high-speed train carriage that advised against consuming strong-smelling foods, including durians and instant noodles. The news quickly went viral, with many taking to social media to express their opinions on the matter.
19 July 2025
According to China Railway Customer Service Center, 12306, the passenger travel guidelines do indeed state that passengers should avoid strong-smelling foods like durians and instant noodles to maintain a good travel environment and fresh air. However, a staff member clarified that regular instant noodles without heating packs can be brought on board, but advised passengers to choose less odorous foods to avoid disturbing others.
The response from netizens has been mixed, with some viewing the suggestion as an overreaction, while others understand the reasoning behind it. Many have criticized the railway authorities for restricting instant noodles while selling expensive boxed meals, which can cost upwards of 40-50 RMB. Others have questioned why other strong odors like cigarette smoke or foot odor are not addressed as strictly.
Some have also pointed out that the restriction disproportionately affects ordinary working-class individuals who rely on instant noodles as a convenient and affordable meal option. On the other hand, some netizens have acknowledged that the strong scent of instant noodles can be disruptive in a confined space and have suggested more practical solutions, such as providing more affordable and less odorous food options or setting up designated dining areas within the train.
The debate highlights the ongoing challenge of balancing individual passenger needs with maintaining a comfortable shared environment on public transport. The 12306 customer service response reflects a nuanced stance from the authorities, advising passengers to choose less odorous food while allowing regular instant noodles without heating packs.
The controversy also has broader implications for the instant noodle industry, which may need to adapt to changing consumer preferences and develop new products with less pungent aromas. The industry may also need to diversify its sales strategies away from relying on specific travel-related consumption scenarios.
In a broader context, the debate reflects a growing awareness and demand for improved public etiquette, especially in shared transportation environments. It brings to the forefront discussions about social responsibility and empathy, and the need for individuals to consider the comfort and well-being of others in public spaces.
The incident also underscores the power of official and unofficial messaging in shaping public behavior and social norms. Even a suggestion or reminder can have a significant impact, and the response from netizens highlights the importance of engaging with and responding to public sentiment.
As the debate continues to unfold, it remains to be seen whether the railway authorities will consider more formal rules or policies regarding food consumption on trains. One thing is certain, however - the seemingly trivial suggestion about instant noodles on high-speed trains has opened up a broader conversation about modern social norms, consumer product adaptation, and the evolving role of public institutions in guiding citizen behavior in an increasingly interconnected and shared environment.
