Counterfeit Gold Scandal Rocks Chinese Bank
A recent incident involving a gold bar purchased from the Shanghai Jiading branch of the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) has sparked heated discussions online. The buyer discovered suspected impurities in the gold bar during the processing stage, raising questions about the product's quality. Despite the bank's declaration that the gold bar was genuine, with a gold content of 99.99%, netizens remain skeptical. This incident has led to a wider inquiry into the origin of gold bars sold by banks, the possibility of adulteration, and the rights of consumers who may have purchased counterfeit gold products.

11 May 2025
The incident began with videos showing a gray substance on the cut surface of the gold bars, which led to widespread discussion and scrutiny. Although ICBC subsequently released test results indicating that the gold bars met the 99.99% purity standard, with the impurities being attributed to external contaminants that could be washed off, many questions remain unanswered. The absence of transparency in the testing method, whether it was non-destructive or destructive, and the lack of a notarization process, have fueled public skepticism. Some have suggested that the gray substance could be a result of the gold bar being exposed to certain conditions after it was purchased, causing a thin layer of a different colored material to form on the surface.
Banks source their gold products from various channels, and in the case of ICBC, their "Ruyi Gold" series is produced in collaboration with the Shandong Gold Group. The gold bars are stamped with the "Shandong Gold" logo, indicating their origin. However, the quality control measures implemented by banks, including sampling inspections, are mainly based on random sampling, which may not guarantee the quality of every gold bar. There is a risk of counterfeit gold bars entering the market, particularly if they are repackaged or resold. The phenomenon of gold turning black during the processing stage has also raised concerns about its authenticity. Experts explain that genuine gold with a purity of 99.99% should not turn black when heated, and any discoloration could indicate the presence of impurities.

Consumers who suspect they have purchased counterfeit gold products can seek compensation and request the bank to provide production certification and inspection reports. They can also consult with national-level testing institutions or seek court-ordered inspections to verify the authenticity of the gold products. To avoid such issues, consumers are advised to exercise caution when purchasing gold products from banks, ensuring they are buying from reputable sources, and carefully inspecting the products before making a purchase. If consumers suspect that they have purchased counterfeit gold, they can request the bank to provide documentation, such as production certificates and testing reports, and seek recourse through official channels, such as the financial regulatory authorities or the courts.
The incident has led to a wave of discussions on social media, with many questioning the source of the bank's gold products, the gold smelting process, and the channels available for consumers to seek redress if they suspect that they have purchased counterfeit gold. The public is also skeptical about the bank's testing methods and the notarization process. As the demand for gold products continues to grow, it is crucial for banks and other industry players to prioritize quality control and consumer protection to maintain public trust and confidence in the market. The incident also revives memories of past scandals, such as the 2012 rumors of gold bars being adulterated with iridium, further eroding public confidence. Rebuilding this trust will be a long and challenging journey for financial institutions, requiring a commitment to transparency and accountability, as well as tangible actions to ensure that such incidents are thoroughly investigated and that preventive measures are put in place to avoid their recurrence.
In response to the incident, some have suggested that banks should provide more transparent information about the origin and quality of their gold products, as well as the testing methods used to verify their authenticity. Others have recommended that consumers take a more proactive approach to verifying the quality of the gold products they purchase, such as requesting certification and inspection reports, and seeking independent testing if necessary. Ultimately, the path forward involves a concerted effort by both the industry and consumers to demand and uphold the highest standards of quality, transparency, and trust. By working together, it is possible to restore public confidence in the gold market and ensure that consumers are protected from counterfeit and adulterated products.
Comments

