X

According to various posts on Weibo, the Chinese equivalent of Twitter, there are two main versions of what happened: one from a girl's perspective, and another from an elderly woman's (presumably the soup dumpling aunt's) perspective. Netizens have expressed their opinions, but many believe that both sides may not be completely truthful.

The first version, as told by the girl, claims that she found impurities in her dumplings and alerted the vendor. This led to a heated argument, with the vendor allegedly becoming aggressive and refusing to give her a refund. The girl then brought a group of postgraduate students to the vendor's stand to demand compensation and threatened to report them for scholarship misconduct.

The second version, from the elderly woman's perspective, paints a very different picture. She claims that the girl first bought dumplings, took a bite, found some skin breaking down in her mouth, and then went back to the stand to complain. However, upon further examination, she found no impurities but instead discovered small holes in the dumplings. The elderly woman believes that this was just an excuse for the girl to cause trouble with a group of gangster postgraduate students, threatening their scholarships.

Many netizens have taken to Weibo to express their opinions on the matter. Some believe that it is inappropriate for the girl to bring a large group of students to cause problems over a consumption dispute. Others argue that the vendor should be responsible for ensuring the quality of its products and refunds should not be refused once impurities are found.

However, not all netizens agree. Some believe that the girl has mental health issues, citing her emotional instability and bitterness when she first purchased the dumplings. They also point out that her use of a scholarship threat against the vendor's customers seems overly aggressive. Others have criticized the gangster postgraduate students for their involvement in the incident, suggesting that they should have reported their concerns to authorities instead of taking matters into their own hands.

As both sides present seemingly conflicting accounts of what happened, netizens have called for an objective decision from official sources rather than relying on social media posts. Some have urged caution in drawing conclusions before knowing all the facts and stressed that gangsterism has no place in such disputes.

The incident has also raised concerns about university expansion and the training of students at Southwest University of Technology, with some questioning whether such behavior is appropriate for 16-year-old students. Furthermore, with the involvement of law enforcement, netizens have expressed hope for a fair resolution without framing innocent parties or letting criminals go unpunished.

As the case continues to unfold, onlookers remain divided over what truly happened and how best to resolve the situation. Regardless, the incident highlights the importance of responsible consumption and respectful communication in resolving disputes.