Unraveling the Complexities of Live Streaming Content: Exploring the Heated Online Debate Surrounding

Many netizens have expressed their dissatisfaction with the situation, arguing that Small Yangge's behavior promotes low standards and misguided humor among the general public. They argue that while live streaming can be a viable means of entertainment, it should not involve exploiting vulgarity and offensive language for attention. Some netizens have expressed concern about the negative impact this may have on society's values and morals, particularly among young audiences who are susceptible to influence from such content.

One Weibo user expressed their discontent by saying, "Thoroughly exploiting low-brow means for attention, now compared with before, it's worse rather than better. Official authorities should deal with this phenomenon and steer the trend in the right direction."

Another user shared a video stating, "What kind of values are being promoted through this live streaming where trashiness is taken as humor? Don't say it's just for fun. Fun isn't looked at like that, right?" They questioned the type of entertainment that promotes vulgarity and offensive humor as acceptable forms of enjoyment, expressing concern about its impact on societal values.

On the other hand, some netizens have come to Small Yangge's defense, arguing that he has his own unique style and deserves recognition for his contributions to live streaming content. They also point out the intense competition in the live streaming market and the fact that performers need to stand out with their own distinctive style.

However, others have criticized Small Yangge's supporters for making excuses for offensive behavior under the guise of entertainment or individuality. They argue that setting low standards and promoting vulgar humor is not only unethical but also harmful to social norms and values.

As Double 11, one of China's largest online shopping events, approaches, netizens have expressed concern about the quality of content on live streaming platforms. They argue that while live streaming can be an effective tool for promoting products and generating traffic, it should not come at the expense of ethical standards and societal values.

In light of these concerns, many netizens have called on officials and authorities to take action against offensive content in live streaming and other forms of online entertainment. They argue that while freedom of expression is important, there must be boundaries in place to prevent the promotion of harmful or unacceptable behavior.

In conclusion, the debate surrounding Small Yangge's live streaming content highlights the complexities and challenges of balancing entertainment and individuality with societal norms and values. While some may argue that tolerating offensive humor is a form of freedom, others emphasize the need for ethical standards and responsible behavior in all forms of public expression. The issue underscores the importance of maintaining a balance between creativity and responsibility when it comes to live streaming content.