Xu Lisha’s Allegations Spark 2025’s Biggest Chinese Entertainment Scandal, Accusing Actor Xu Kai of Multiple Affairs and Privacy Violations.

According to Xu Lisha, the two first met at a corporate gathering in 2021, where a drunken encounter at a party allegedly led to a kiss that she says was forced upon her. The same year, the two allegedly crossed paths again while working on the television drama “Qing Qing Ri Chang” (卿卿日常), and began a romantic relationship that, by Xu Lisha’s account, lasted until mid‑2022.

The turning point, she claims, came in June 2022 when she allegedly spotted Xu Kai and a fellow actress, Zhao Qing, entering a hotel together. The photo, which quickly trended on Chinese micro‑blogs, sparked a heated argument between the couple, leading to their split. In Xu Lisha’s narrative, the affair with Zhao Qing was only the first of several indiscretions. She says she later discovered a pattern of “one‑man‑boat” behaviour, with the actor allegedly juggling multiple women simultaneously.

The timeline continues into 2023. In April of that year, Xu Lisha says she removed Xu Kai’s contact information after enduring “verbal abuse and criticism” from the actor and harassment from his fan base. By October, she alleges the actor attempted to reconnect via WeChat, an outreach she rebuffed.

The dispute resurfaced in late August 2025. On August 22, Xu Lisha posted a long, detailed essay on her social media accounts, laying out a month‑by‑month chronology of their relationship and naming alleged “third parties” beyond Zhao Qing. She accused Xu Kai of repeatedly “cheating” and even “keeping several boats afloat at once.” The post, which contains screenshots of private chat logs, was framed as a “full disclosure” and a pre‑emptive move against anticipated legal action. She warned that if her claims are true, the actor should “face the consequences,” a phrase that quickly caught the imagination of netizens and was dubbed the “2025 entertainment industry’s biggest scandal.”

Xu Kai’s camp has not been silent. The actor’s official studio, together with his agent Yu Zheng—a well‑known producer and screenwriter—issued statements denying any romantic involvement with Xu Lisha. Yu Zheng also attempted to explain the hotel photograph of Xu Kai and Zhao Qing, insisting it was merely a “script‑reading session” rather than evidence of an affair. Both the studio and Yu Zheng have called the allegations “baseless” and have warned that they will pursue legal remedies if the accusations continue to spread unchecked.

The public reaction has been immediate and polarized. Supporters of Xu Lisha praise her for “breaking the silence” and exposing alleged hypocrisy within the star‑studded circles of Chinese television. Critics, however, accuse her of seeking publicity or attempting to leverage the scandal for personal gain. The broader Chinese internet community has dubbed the episode “the 2025 ‘瓜’ (big watermelon) of the entertainment world,” reflecting both the intrigue and the appetite for scandal that pervades online forums.

Beyond the personal drama, the episode illustrates deeper societal currents. Repeated accusations of infidelity among high‑profile actors fuel a growing erosion of trust in celebrity culture, as fans grapple with the dissonance between polished public images and rumored private conduct. Moreover, the alleged sharing of private messages and photographs raises critical privacy concerns, prompting calls for stronger legal protections against non‑consensual recording and data misuse.

Industry observers note that the incident puts further pressure on social‑media platforms and talent agencies to enforce stricter verification and monitoring mechanisms. As the line between personal life and public persona blurs, experts warn that platforms may face heightened liability for facilitating the spread of unverified claims or for allowing the dissemination of potentially illegal recordings.

Legal experts also point out that Chinese law has recently tightened around privacy violations, cyberstalking, and online fraud. Should any of the alleged evidence—particularly private chats—be proven to have been obtained or shared without consent, both the accuser and the accused could find themselves entangled in lawsuits. The case may also spur legislative review, as lawmakers consider how to balance freedom of expression with the need to protect individuals from defamation and digital intrusion.

For now, the story remains in flux. Xu Lisha continues to post updates, promising further revelations, while Xu Kai’s representatives maintain their denials and hint at possible legal action. Whether the scandal will fade into another footnote of celebrity gossip or evolve into a landmark case on privacy and defamation remains to be seen. In the meantime, the Chinese internet watches, comments, and debates—a testament to the enduring fascination with the private lives of public figures.