China Executes 21‑Year‑Old for Jealousy‑Fueled Teeth‑Ripping Assault and Murder, Sparking Nationwide Outcry.

The perpetrator, identified as Huang Mouyun, was born in 2002 in Jianghua Yao Autonomous County, Hunan. His victim, known only as Wu Mou, was his girlfriend at the time. On June 29, 2023, Huang, consumed by jealousy, confronted Wu in the rented apartment they shared in Houjie Town, Dongguan City. Believing Wu was unfaithful with a man identified as Liu Moumou, he seized a pair of pliers and forcibly ripped eight of her lower teeth from their sockets. Wu suffered severe injury and lasting disfigurement.

Later that same day, Huang tracked Liu to his place of work, followed the man into a bathroom and struck him in the head and face, leaving Liu with only minor injuries. Huang then fled the scene, heading east to Changsha, the capital of Hunan.

Two days after the initial assault, on July 1, 2023, Huang confronted another figure from his past: Fang Mou, a former station manager at an express‑delivery depot in Kaifu District, Changsha. The two had been locked in a dispute over unpaid wages. In the ensuing argument, Huang brandished a knife and attempted to stab Fang. Two by‑standers intervened, sustaining light injuries, but Huang persisted, chasing Fang and stabbing him repeatedly. Fang died at the scene, and Huang was apprehended by police on the spot.

The legal process moved swiftly. The Changsha Intermediate People’s Court tried Huang on charges of intentional homicide and intentional injury. He was convicted of both crimes and handed a death sentence, accompanied by lifelong deprivation of political rights, as well as an additional term of four years and six months for the injuries he inflicted on Wu. Huang chose not to appeal the first‑instance judgment. His case was reviewed by the Hunan Provincial Higher People’s Court, which upheld the verdict, and then forwarded to the Supreme People’s Court for final approval. In August 2025, the Supreme Court authorized the execution, and on August 29, 2025 the Changsha Intermediate People’s Court carried out the sentence after confirming Huang’s identity.

The brutality of the case has ignited a torrent of public outcry on China’s dominant micro‑blogging platform, Weibo. Users described the act of extracting teeth as “too extreme” and “horrifying,” expressing empathy for Wu’s permanent physical and psychological trauma. Comments repeatedly condemned Huang’s “twisted psychology” and “serial violent criminal” behavior, noting the rapid escalation from domestic abuse to murder. Many highlighted the legal consequences, underscoring that “violence is always the abyss of crime” and praising the death sentence as a just outcome.

Beyond the immediate shock, the incident has prompted broader reflection on several deep‑seated societal issues. Analysts point to a stark deficiency in conflict‑resolution skills among some young adults, especially when jealousy or suspicion is involved. The method of punishment—pulling out teeth—was interpreted as a chilling expression of misogyny and a desire to dominate a partner’s body, reinforcing the notion that a woman’s autonomy can be violently stripped away when deemed “disobedient.”

Mental‑health experts have warned that Huang’s rapid succession of violent acts—assault, stabbing, murder—suggests underlying psychiatric disturbances, possibly coupled with antisocial or psychopathic traits. The case, they say, underscores the urgent need for early detection and intervention for individuals exhibiting such warning signs.

The public discourse also touched on the role of socioeconomic pressures. Some commenters linked Huang’s outbursts to feelings of desperation tied to limited social mobility, noting that while poverty is not a direct cause of violence, chronic hardship can exacerbate stress and exacerbate a propensity for aggression.

Social media’s role in disseminating the story cannot be overstated. Within hours of the initial reports, the narrative spread across platforms, fueling nationwide condemnation and sparking conversations about safe relationship practices. Advice to “look for violent tendencies early, break up, and call the police” was repeatedly echoed, reflecting a growing awareness of the need to intervene before domestic abuse escalates.

The case has also shone a light on China’s legal response to extreme interpersonal violence. The swift, decisive sentencing and eventual execution send a clear message that the judiciary will not tolerate such brutality. Yet the episode raises lingering questions about preventive measures: how can authorities better identify potential perpetrators, and what support systems can be bolstered for victims before tragedies reach a point of no return?

In the end, the harrowing tale of a post‑00s man who, driven by jealousy, ripped out his girlfriend’s teeth and later murdered a former colleague, serves as a stark reminder of the devastating consequences when jealousy, unchecked aggression, and a lack of emotional regulation converge. It underscores the imperative for society to confront toxic relationship dynamics, invest in mental‑health resources, and reinforce legal protections that deter and respond to domestic and relational violence. The collective outrage and grief that followed the case may, at the very least, catalyze a deeper conversation about how to prevent such horrors from ever happening again.