China Firmly Rejects Philippine Demand for Nuclear Disarmament Amid Rising Regional Tensions
The Ministry of National Defense responds to the Philippines' demand for China to abandon nuclear weapons

15 July 2025
In a recent escalation of tensions between the Philippines and China, Philippine Defense Minister Teodoro publicly demanded on July 4 that China abandon its nuclear weapons, suggesting that China's signing of the Southeast Asian Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone Treaty protocol was merely for show. He claimed that only by relinquishing nuclear weapons could China demonstrate sincerity. China's Ministry of National Defense spokesperson, Colonel Jiang Bin, responded firmly on July 14, expressing puzzlement at the unfounded attacks on China's efforts to maintain regional peace. Jiang emphasized China's commitment to a self-defensive nuclear strategy and declared that any country deploying nuclear weapons in the ASEAN region would face resolute countermeasures from China.
This incident has drawn significant attention, as the Philippines' move is seen as aligning with the United States on the nuclear issue, posing an unnecessary challenge to regional peace. The exchange between the two countries carries implications across political, societal, and industrial spheres.

Politically, the incident marks an escalated regional tension, with the Philippines' demand viewed as infringing on Chinese sovereignty. The strengthened alliance between the Philippines and the United States is evident in the emboldened stance of the former. This nuclear disarmament call also puts pressure on ASEAN unity, as divergent approaches regarding relations with China and external powers become apparent.
Societally, the exchange fuels heightened nationalism in both countries, potentially raising public anxiety about regional conflict and stability. Media narratives surrounding the incident could reinforce prejudices or foster new perceptions about national security and foreign relations.
Indirect industrial implications may include increased defense spending, leading to benefits for defense industries. However, prolonged geopolitical friction could create economic uncertainty, affecting foreign investment, trade routes, and supply chains in the region. Elevated tensions might also impact industries reliant on strategic resources, such as fisheries, oil, and gas, in the disputed South China Sea.
In essence, the Philippine demand for China's nuclear disarmament, and China's swift rebuff, reflects a deeper structural tension in the Indo-Pacific. It underscores the complex interplay of alliances, national security doctrines, and the ongoing competition for regional influence, with potential long-term ramifications across various sectors.