Fans Spot Matching Pendant on Lu Han and Guan Xiaotong, Fueling Rumors of a Rekindled Romance

The focal point of the debate is a tiny charm that depicts a little deer clutching a sweet‑cone ice‑cream. At Lu Han’s concert in Zhengzhou on August 10, 2025, the singer was photographed with the “小鹿手持甜筒” pendant dangling from his chain. A few weeks earlier, in June, Guan Xiaotong was spotted with an identical “小鹿甜筒” charm attached to the strap of her backpack while filming a television drama. Fans quickly noted the visual similarity and, noting that “甜筒” (sweet cone) sounds like the “彤” in Guan’s given name, began to read the accessory as a subtle love token.

Supporters of the theory flooded the hashtag with posts celebrating the “couple item,” recalling past instances of the pair’s coordinated fashion—most famously a pair of matching jackets that appeared on both of them in 2023. For many, the pendant is a romantic gesture, a quiet nod that the two are still together despite earlier rumors of a breakup that circulated in late 2024. A number of fan accounts even suggested that the repeated use of matching accessories could be a deliberate signal to their followers.

Not everyone is convinced. Other commentators pointed out that Lu Han’s stylists have supplied him with a wide array of pendants for his four recent tours, and that deer‑themed jewelry is a recurring motif in his wardrobe. One user argued that the charm is likely a brand‑issued item, noting that Guan Xiaotong’s own fan club had already confirmed the couple’s split in early 2025. From this perspective, the pendant is nothing more than a coincidence, a product of professional styling rather than a personal message.

The split in opinion underscores how quickly a minor visual cue can ignite a broader conversation in China’s celebrity‑obsessed fan culture. Within hours of the initial posts, the hashtag climbed the Weibo trending list, and media outlets—both domestic and international—picked up the story, citing netizens’ observations and the two public appearances as evidence. The episode illustrates the power of social media to amplify even the most fleeting details of a star’s public image, turning a simple accessory into a flashpoint for speculation about private relationships.

While the “matching pendant” saga has not rippled beyond fan circles or altered the entertainment industry’s landscape, it offers a snapshot of the ongoing tension between celebrity privacy and public curiosity. The incident shows how fans, armed with smartphones and a keen eye for symbolism, can construct narratives that outpace official statements, and how media platforms can rapidly disseminate and magnify those narratives.

In short, the tiny deer‑and‑ice‑cream charm has become a micro‑cultural flashpoint: for some, a sweet affirmation of a romance that may still be alive; for others, a harmless stylistic choice with no deeper meaning. As the conversation continues to swirl online, it serves as a reminder that in the age of instant sharing, even the smallest details can spark a global dialogue about the lives of the famous.