Father Denies Abuse Allegations in Infant Suffocation Case

According to Yang, she and Shu met in early 2023, and she became pregnant in September of the same year. The couple got married at the end of 2023, and their baby was born on May 15, 2024. After the birth, Yang and the baby stayed at a maternity center, while Shu was absent for an extended period. When Shu finally appeared on June 29, he forced Yang to leave the center and took the baby away, despite Yang's attempts to communicate with him.

Yang provided a chat record from July 5, which showed that Shu had proposed a condition for them to part ways, stating that the child would stay with Yang, the house would be given to her, and Shu would receive 400,000 yuan in savings, with each party paying half of the child's living expenses. Yang believed that the house and savings were her premarital properties, and she had also spent 100,000 yuan to buy a car.

On July 13, the two-month-old baby was found dead due to suffocation. Yang also told reporters that in March, she and her mother had gone to their home to collect some belongings, only to find that the door password had been changed. They called a locksmith, and when Shu appeared, a dispute broke out, during which Yang claimed that Shu had physically abused her and her mother.

The prosecution's indictment shows that Shu was released on bail on September 4, 2024, pending trial for negligent homicide. Yang provided two medical records, which indicated that she and her mother had suffered closed cranial brain injuries and soft tissue damage. A document from the Xiangyang Public Security Bureau's East Jin New District Branch confirmed that Shu's actions constituted physical assault, and he was given 10 days of administrative detention and a fine of 500 yuan.

Despite the evidence, Shu denied all allegations, stating that he had not physically abused Yang or her mother. He also claimed that the house and savings were his property, and he had used Yang's name to take out a loan to buy the house, with all the payment records in his possession.

The case has been tried in court, and the prosecution has charged Shu with negligent homicide. While awaiting the verdict, the community is left to ponder the significance of parental responsibility and the need for stricter regulations to ensure child safety. This incident highlights the importance of prioritizing children's well-being and safety above all else.

The trial result of this case will not only determine Shu's personal responsibility but also send a strong message to society about the gravity of neglecting one's parental duties. The consequences of such negligence can be severe and will be subject to legal sanctions. Ultimately, the outcome of this case will serve as a reminder to parents and institutions alike that the safety and well-being of children are of paramount importance, and any negligence or wrongdoing will be held accountable.