Zhao Lusi Denies Nose‑Job Rumors in Live Stream, Igniting Wider Debate on Beauty Standards and Privacy】
Zhao Lusi, one of China’s most popular young actresses, has once again found herself at the center of a social‑media firestorm over rumors that she has undergone a nose‑job. The speculation, which has circulated for years, resurfaced in full force on August 9 when the star took to a live broadcast on Weibo to address the claims head‑on.

10 August 2025
During the stream, Zhao delivered an emphatic denial, quipping, “If my nose moved, I’d be hit by a car when I go out.” The remark, a literal translation of the viral phrase “我鼻子动了我出门被车撞死,” was meant to underscore how absurd she finds the allegations. She added that the rumors have persisted despite her repeated attempts to set the record straight, and expressed frustration at the endless scrutiny of a feature that, she insists, has never been altered surgically.
The phrase that sparked the controversy, “鼻子动了” (literally “nose moved”), is a euphemism in Chinese celebrity gossip for a cosmetic procedure on the nose. Translations in English have varied from “Zhao Lusi responds to claims about her nose changing” to the more pointed “Zhao Lusi denies having a nose job.” All capture the same underlying tension: a public figure forced to defend a personal, physical attribute against unverified speculation.

Fans rallied behind Zhao, pointing out that her nose bears a striking resemblance to her father’s and that makeup tricks—contouring, highlighters, and strategic lighting—can easily create the illusion of a different shape. One supporter summed it up: “If the only path you see for girls to become beautiful is cosmetic surgery, then the world you see is too small.” Others, however, remained skeptical, interpreting her dramatic denial as a sign that there might be something to hide. The intensity of her response, they argued, only added fuel to the debate.
The episode illustrates a broader, relentless pressure on female celebrities in China’s entertainment industry to conform to ever‑sharper beauty standards. Even minor perceived changes—whether a new hairstyle, a slightly different eyebrow shape, or a subtle shift in facial proportion—can trigger a cascade of rumors, amplified by platforms like Weibo where gossip spreads at the speed of a retweet. For stars such as Zhao, the line between authentic self‑presentation and strategic image management is increasingly blurred. A past interview in which she mused, “If I had plastic surgery, I would share medical aesthetics tips,” hinted at a willingness to discuss cosmetic enhancements openly, yet her current denial suggests that the stigma attached to “nose jobs” still looms large.
The incident also dovetails with a separate wave of online outrage: a leak of Zhao’s personal phone number that trended alongside the #ZhaoLusiPhoneNumberLeaked hashtag. The breach shifted some of the conversation from cosmetic speculation to concerns over privacy and the mental toll of constant public scrutiny. Many commenters expressed sympathy, noting that the invasive nature of the leak made the ongoing rumors about her appearance feel especially cruel.
Beyond the entertainment sphere, the controversy spotlights a societal fixation on physical perfection. The rapid spread of unverified claims—often bordering on cyberbullying—exposes how quickly rumors can morph into personal attacks, affecting not only the celebrities involved but also influencing public attitudes toward body image. As ordinary users compare themselves to the “ideal” looks of stars, the pressure to seek similar enhancements, whether through makeup, filters, or surgery, intensifies.
In the end, Zhao Lusi’s August 9 live‑broadcast denial may have quelled the immediate chatter for her supporters, but it also opened a wider dialogue about the cultural expectations placed on women in the public eye, the power of social media to magnify rumor mills, and the fine line between freedom of expression and defamation. Whether the “nose job” rumors fade into the background or re‑emerge with new twists, they serve as a reminder that in the age of instant information, even a single facial feature can become a flashpoint for broader debates on beauty, privacy, and the cost of fame.