University Embroiled in Controversy Over Graduate's Street Stall Video

According to the blogger, she was contacted by her university and asked to delete the video, with the school citing concerns that the content was damaging to its reputation. The blogger refused, stating that selling ice cream was her personal choice and did not reflect on the university. However, the university has since denied that it asked the blogger to delete the video, claiming that the blogger's account of events was inaccurate and that the school supports its students' personal choices.

There is a discrepancy between the accounts of the school and the graduate regarding the request to delete the video. The graduate claimed that her university contacted her to delete the video, stating that it had a negative impact on the school's reputation. In contrast, the school has vehemently denied this claim, with a spokesperson stating that they "do not discriminate against any profession" and that they actively support students in finding employment and starting their own businesses. The school's propaganda department also released a statement saying that the graduate's assertions are "untrue" and "slanderous."

The graduate shared a video recording of a phone call with her former university counselor, which she claimed was evidence of the school's request to delete the video. She also shared chat records, which appeared to show the counselor pressuring her to remove the video. On the other hand, the school maintains that the graduate's decision to become a street vendor is a personal choice and that they would not hinder her endeavors. A school representative told Xiangxiang Morning Post that the graduate had graduated and found employment at a hospital in Guangxi, but left after two years, and that the school does not know why she left.

The conflicting accounts have sparked a heated debate online, with some netizens questioning the school's motives and others defending the institution's right to protect its reputation. Many netizens have expressed outrage over the university's actions, viewing them as an overreach of authority and an attempt to suppress dissenting voices. Others have defended the university's stance, arguing that the content of the video may have been inappropriate or damaging to the university's reputation.

The incident has also raised questions about the power dynamics at play in the relationship between educational institutions and their students. Some see this as an opportunity for constructive dialogue between universities and their students, suggesting that perhaps this incident can serve as a catalyst for universities to review their policies and engage in open discussions with students about what is acceptable and what isn't. The controversy surrounding the university's response to the graduate's video has shed light on the reality of employment issues faced by many students, particularly in the medical field.

The fact that a medical student, once considered a highly employable profession, has resorted to selling goods on the street has sparked widespread concern. The university's initial reaction, which was perceived as dismissive and unsupportive, has been met with criticism from netizens. Many have pointed out that the university's priorities seem misplaced, with some suggesting that they should focus on addressing the underlying issues of unemployment and underemployment among graduates rather than trying to suppress the negative publicity.

In reality, the university's response should be centered around providing genuine support and resources to help graduates navigate the challenging job market. This could include offering career counseling, job placement services, and entrepreneurship programs to help students develop skills and find employment opportunities. By doing so, the university can demonstrate its commitment to the well-being and success of its graduates, rather than simply trying to maintain a positive public image. Ultimately, the university's reputation will be better served by showing that it truly cares about the welfare of its students, rather than trying to silence those who speak out about their struggles.