Experts Call for 10-Year Compulsory Education and Cancellation of Middle School Exams
Recently, education experts have suggested shortening the compulsory education period to 10 years and canceling middle school entrance exams, sparking heated discussions on social media. Experts argue that the current 12-year education system is too long, leading to excessive pressure on students to prepare for the high school entrance exams, and ultimately resulting in students entering the workforce too late, wasting precious years of youth.

20 March 2025
Professor Jin Canrong from Renmin University of China believes that the current education system has too much repetitive content, wasting students' youthful years. He suggests that reforming the system to make it 10 years long would allow students to obtain a high school diploma at a younger age, equipped with basic labor skills. Similarly, Professor Yang Deguang from Shanghai Normal University proposed shortening the compulsory education period to 10 years and canceling middle school entrance exams, replacing high school entrance exams with a comprehensive evaluation system that takes into account students' academic performance, comprehensive abilities, and special talents.
The online community's response to the expert's suggestion has been mixed. Some people support the cancellation of the middle school entrance exam and the shortening of the education system to 10 years, believing it can alleviate students' pressure and allow them to develop better. On the other hand, some oppose the idea, arguing that the middle school entrance exam and the college entrance exam are the fairest ways to enroll students, and canceling the middle school entrance exam would make it harder for children from ordinary families to attend good universities.
Netizens have expressed concerns that the current education system is too focused on rote memorization and standardized testing, which can be detrimental to students' creative thinking and other skills. They agree that the suggested reform could help reduce unnecessary repetition and allow students to explore their interests and talents earlier. However, others expressed concerns that canceling the middle school entrance exam could lead to a lack of accountability and fairness in the education system.
The implications of such a reform are multifaceted. On one hand, reducing the educational period and eliminating a crucial exam like the middle school exam could significantly alleviate the stress and burden on students, allowing for a more balanced and enjoyable educational experience. On the other hand, it raises questions about the preparedness of students for higher education and the potential impact on the quality of education.
Given the complexity of the issue, it is crucial for the education department and experts to work together to explore the best solutions. This includes conducting thorough research on the potential outcomes of such reforms, both positive and negative, and considering international best practices in education that prioritize student well-being and academic excellence. The ultimate goal of any educational reform should be to provide students with the best possible educational experience, one that is holistic, reduces unnecessary pressure, and fosters intellectual curiosity and creativity.
Looking ahead, the success of such a reform will depend on careful planning, implementation, and continuous evaluation. It will be essential to monitor the impact of the shortened educational period and the abolition of the middle school exam on students' academic performance, mental health, and future career prospects. This will help in making necessary adjustments and ensuring that the educational system remains vibrant, relevant, and student-centered. By focusing on a student-centered approach and continuously assessing the impact of the reforms, there is potential for creating a more balanced, effective, and enjoyable educational system.

