Man Sentenced to 15 Years for 'Intentional Homicide' in Failed Suicide Pact
The couple, known by their surnames, Li and Zhang, had divorced but continued to live together. Despite their separation, they decided to enter into a suicide pact, planning to die together. The plan involved injecting themselves with insulin, which they believed would lead to a peaceful death. However, the woman, Zhang, passed away, and Li, the man, changed his mind after being persuaded by friends and family.

23 February 2024
This case, which has been referred to as an "absurd" one by the press, raised questions about whether Li should be held criminally responsible for Zhang's death. The court in Changchun ultimately decided that he was guilty, sentencing him to 15 years in prison for "intentional homicide."
According to court documents, Li and Zhang had purchased insulin and syringes from an online marketplace and checked into a hotel room in Changchun. In a statement released by the court, Li said, "Let's buy some lottery tickets first. If we win, we won't have to die." The couple then wrote suicide notes before checking the lottery results. When Zhang found out that they had not won, she began to inject herself with insulin. Li, who had changed his mind about the suicide pact, did not intervene as Zhang became unconscious and ultimately died.
The court found that Li had a duty to help Zhang, but he failed to act, resulting in her death. The court took into account that Li had surrendered himself to the police and expressed remorse for his actions.
The case has sparked heated debates on Chinese social media, with many users comparing the story to classic Chinese literature and movies where the male protagonist regrets his decision to die with his lover. Some users have criticized Li for not intervening to save Zhang's life, while others have expressed sympathy for him, noting that he, too, was a victim of their tragic decision.
This case highlights the complexities of suicide pacts and the legal implications of such decisions. It has also shed light on the ways in which these situations can be exploited for criminal gain. The Changchun court's decision to convict Li of "intentional homicide" sends a clear message that those who engage in suicide pacts can be held criminally responsible for the outcome, even if they have a change of heart.
It remains to be seen whether this case will set a precedent for similar cases in the future. In the meantime, it serves as a stark reminder of the potentially devastating consequences of entering into a suicide pact.



