Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay updated with the latest news and trends. No spam, unsubscribe any time.

Browse

Categories, quick links and the newsletter.

Quick Links

Newsletter

Get the latest updates

Subscribe to our newsletter to stay informed about trending topics.

Life Stories

The Necklace Was 14,100 Yuan. The Apology Was Five.

A shopper bought a 14,100-yuan Van Cleef & Arpels necklace for 55 yuan when a pricing glitch slipped through, then accepted a 5-yuan goodwill payment when the platform blamed its own system bug and cancelled the order. The episode became a study in how Chinese e-commerce smooths over its own mistakes.

The necklace was listed at 55 yuan, properly priced at 14,100, and the woman who ordered it did not expect it to ship. What she got instead, when the platform rang on the afternoon of August 21, was a refund of her 55 yuan and an apology — plus a goodwill payment of 5 yuan for her trouble.

The glitch, on a Van Cleef & Arpels shop on a major Chinese e-commerce platform, was caught the night of August 19. A shopper surnamed Wang spotted the price, placed the order, and then did precisely nothing to press the seller, because she had already guessed the real value. "I'm not trying to grab a bargain," she told a reporter. "My income could cover this necklace. I never once urged the merchant to send it."

The platform's explanation was that the "system bug" was its own doing, not the merchant's. In a recorded call that Wang later shared, a staffer walks through the resolution: they will help with the refund, and — by way of thanks — add five yuan. Wang said she accepted happily. "We're all working people. I understand how hard it is."

That acceptance, rather than the glitch itself, is what made the story trend. The post from the Chengdu-based Cover News documenting the follow-up was liked more than 23,000 times. The number that floated to the top of the discussion was not the 14,045-yuan discount she failed to collect, but the five-yuan sincerity attached to it. A 5-yuan note will just about buy a pouch of low-end tissue on a Chinese app; as compensation for nearly losing a luxury necklace, it reads as either a gaffe or a dry joke the platform did not intend to make.

There is a familiar choreography beneath the mild comedy. E-commerce platforms in China are prompt to cancel mispriced orders, confident in their terms-of-service fine print, but they also know a single viral recording can do outsized reputational damage. The 5-yuan payment is that logic in miniature: a token calibrated to the system's obligations, which are real but small, and to the customer's dignity, which the platform would very much like not to be the next trending topic.

Wang got her 55 yuan back, kept her five-yuan goodwill fee, and the necklace went back into the listings at its proper price. Everyone behaved beautifully, as befits a story about a bargain that was always too good to be true.