Subscribe to our Newsletter

Stay updated with the latest news and trends

Get the latest updates

Subscribe to our newsletter to stay informed about trending topics.

Quick Links

Newsletter

Get the latest updates

Subscribe to our newsletter to stay informed about trending topics.

Yu Shuxin's Parents Win Contract Dispute Case, Court Orders Defendant to Pay Over 6 Million Yuan

A recent contract dispute case involving Shanghai Hao Yu Industrial Co., Ltd., a company owned equally by the parents of Chinese actress Yu Shuxin, has come to light. The case, which was filed by the company, sought the return of a performance bond of 4 million yuan, as well as interest payments. According to reports, the company was invited to invest in a project and, lacking the necessary construction qualifications, partnered with another company to sign the contract. A guarantee of 10 million yuan was paid, but the project was unable to proceed due to the defendant's breach of contract. Despite efforts to recover the guarantee, the company was unsuccessful, leading to the filing of the lawsuit.

12 June 2025

The defendant argued that no written contract had been signed between the two parties, and therefore, no contractual relationship existed. However, the court ultimately ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to return the performance bond of 4 million yuan, as well as interest payments exceeding 2.11 million yuan. This ruling has brought attention to the complexities of contract disputes and the importance of clear agreements in business dealings.

The court's final judgment was that the defendant is required to return to the plaintiff the contract fulfillment guarantee, along with interest totaling over 2.11 million yuan. This ruling signifies a decisive victory for the plaintiff in the contractual dispute. Netizens have rallied around Yu Shuxin, expressing support for her and her family as they navigate the aftermath of the lawsuit. Many have taken to social media to commend her parents for fighting for their rights, emphasizing that they are not "deadbeat debtors" but rather victims of fraud seeking justice.

The public's backing serves as a testament to the growing trend of supporting individuals, particularly those in the public eye, as they work to clear their names and seek rightful compensation. The loan interest rate charged by Yu Shuxin's parents' company is 13.8%, significantly lower than the 36% threshold considered usurious. The legal system allows for interest to exceed the principal amount if the debt is over 10 years old, which seems to be the case here. The judgment is seen as a vindication for Yu Shuxin and her parents, countering previous allegations of illegal lending practices.

The judgment in the contract dispute involving Yu Shuxin's parents' company has brought to light the facts of the case, clearly stating that the loan interest rate was 13.8%. This rate is notably lower than the 36% threshold that distinguishes legitimate lending from usury. The legal community recognizes that for debts outstanding over 10 years, it is not uncommon for interest to accumulate to an amount exceeding the original principal, which seems to be the situation here. In light of this, it is advisable for those who have been critical of Yu Shuxin and her family to familiarize themselves with the relevant legal statutes before making further accusations, lest they find themselves on the receiving end of a lawsuit.


Advertisement